european certification logo
iso certification services
Thursday, 17 September 2015

7 Key Differences You Need To Know About ISO 14001:2015

The revision of ISO 14001:2004 (Environmental Management Systems) has been approved and so the new standard ISO 14001:2015 has been officially issued.
Here, we outline the 7 key differences that you need to know.

What are the main differences in content between the old ISO 14001:2004 and the new ISO 14001:2015 for Environmental Management Systems?

Strategic Environmental Management – There is an increased prominence of environmental management within the organization’s strategic planning processes. A new requirement to understand that the organization’s context has been incorporated to identify and leverage opportunities for the benefit of both the organization and the environment. Particular focus is on issues or changing circumstances related to the needs and expectations of interested parties (including regulatory requirements) and local, regional or global environmental conditions that can affect, or be affected by, the organization. Once identified as a priority, actions to mitigate adverse risk or exploit beneficial opportunities are integrated in the operational planning of the environmental management system.


Leadership – To ensure the success of the system, a new clause has been added that assigns specific responsibilities for those in leadership roles to promote environmental management within the organization.


Protecting the environment – The expectation on organizations has been expanded to commit to proactive initiatives to protect the environment from harm and degradation, consistent with the context of the organization. The revised text does not define ‘protect the environment’ but it notes that it can include prevention of pollution, sustainable resource use, climate change mitigation and adaptation, protection of biodiversity and ecosystems, etc.


Environmental performance – There is a shift in emphasis with regard to continual improvement, from improving the management system to improving environmental performance. Consistent with the organization’s policy commitments the organization would, as applicable, reduce emissions, effluents and waste to levels set by itself.


Lifecycle thinking – In addition to the current requirement to manage environmental aspects associated with procured goods and services, organizations will need to extend their control and influence to the environmental impacts associated with product use and end-of-life treatment or disposal. This does not imply a requirement to do a life cycle assessment.


Communication – The development of a communications strategy with equal emphasis on external and internal communications has been added. This includes a requirement to communicating consistent and reliable information, and establishing mechanisms for persons working under the organization's control to make suggestions on improving the environmental management system. The decision to communicate externally is retained by the organization but the decision needs to take into account information reporting required by regulatory agencies and the expectations of other interested parties.


Documentation – Reflecting the evolution of computer and cloud based systems for running management systems, the revision incorporates the term ‘documented information’, instead of ‘documents’ and ‘records’. To align with ISO 9001, the organization will retain the flexibility to determine when ‘procedures’ are needed to ensure effective process control.


Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.